Different spacing depending on type of glyphs?
Posted: 28 Sep 2022
Hello everyone,
I am currently working on a very simple, blocky and display typeface, and I'd like the spacing and kerning to be treated in a very simplified way. While working with KO I get the feeling that it treats glyphs differently depending on their type (If they are UC, LC, Figures, etc.). For example: the design and metrics of my /O is exactly the same as the /zero yet KO says that /zero/zero is too tight compared to /O/O.
Is there anyway to override this?
Thanks in advance for any hints or tips.
PS. Thanks Tim for the great tool, been enjoying it so far.
I am currently working on a very simple, blocky and display typeface, and I'd like the spacing and kerning to be treated in a very simplified way. While working with KO I get the feeling that it treats glyphs differently depending on their type (If they are UC, LC, Figures, etc.). For example: the design and metrics of my /O is exactly the same as the /zero yet KO says that /zero/zero is too tight compared to /O/O.
Is there anyway to override this?
Thanks in advance for any hints or tips.
PS. Thanks Tim for the great tool, been enjoying it so far.